Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Olivbb, Chief Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case is described on the invoice as “1 — Helm 70 MM. Photofluorographic Camera Complete including two (2) film magazines for American Film Perforation.” It was exported from Denmark and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md. It was classified for duty at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1551, Tariff Act of 1930, as “photographic cameras.” It is claimed properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 under the same act, as modified, as “* * * X-ray apparatus, instruments (other than laboratory), and devices * * * and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Best Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.