Legal Opinion

Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1968No. C.D. 3556PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, was imported from Italy and entered at the port of Houston, Texas, on April 23, 1962, February 18, 1963, and November 6, 1961. It consists of various items to be used in a Casale ammonia synthesis unit at the W. R. Grace plant at Big Springs, Texas.

The merchandise described as parts for internal converters, catalyst basket and heater housing tube, covered by protests 65/4552 and 65/4553, was assessed with duty at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 319 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as catalyst chambers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Amersham Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. West Coast Glass Distributors v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Wilfred Schade & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API