Legal Opinion

Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 21, 1966No. 5196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Acting Chief Judge

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division (C.D. 2486 ),1 overruling appellants protest to the classification of Fairchild-Odelca photofluorographic cameras, models X-YOS and X-YOSA together with certain items of auxiliary equipment.

*123The collector classified the imports under paragraph 1551, Tariff Act of 1930, and claim is made under paragraph 353 as modified. The statutes are:

Paragraph 1551 provides in pertinent part, as follows:

Photographic cameras and parts thereof, not specially provided for, 20 per centum ad valorem * * *

Paragraph 353, as modified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Allstar Marketing Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API