Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 19, 1967No. C.D. 2872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNlon, Judge:

Certain hearing aids and parts thereof, exported variously from Austria, Denmark and Switzerland, were imported by plaintiff, a customs broker, at Chicago for the account of Fidelity Electronics, Ltd. As to two entries, importation was directly by Fidelity Electronics, Ltd. The several importations extend from July 12,1961, to November 26, 1962. All of the entries at bar were liquidated as entered, between April 25, 1962, and April 24, 1963.

Five protests are before us, consolidated for purposes of trial. The protests run to that part only of the entered merchandise which is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Westinghouse Electric International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Dodge & Olcott v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards Medical Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Inabata Specialty Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API