Legal Opinion
Orgel v. Clark Boardman Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Defendants move under Rule 30(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., to limit the scope of examination before trial. Plaintiffs, in an action for copyright infringement and unfair competition, seek an injunction, damages and an accounting for profits. No jury trial has been demanded. Plaintiffs propose to examine the defendant publisher extensively on the issue of damages and profits, and defendants urge that such an examination should await the establishment of their liability.
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co., 1933, 289 U.S. 689, 53 S.Ct. 736, 77…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Fox v. HouseDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1939
- Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- American Mfg. Co. v. ExermontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lance, Inc. v. GinsburgDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Fairchild Stratos Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Guo v. National Endowment for DemocracyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United Founders Life Insurance v. RousselDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980