Legal Opinion

Fairchild Stratos Corp. v. General Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Defendant General Electric Company (“GE”) has moved for an order directing separate trials on the issues of liability and damages and a protective order staying discovery as to damages pending the determination of liability. Rules 42(b) and 30(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.

The underlying action is a suit for damages filed October 3, 1961, in which jury trial has been demanded by plaintiff, Fairchild Stratos Corporation (“Fair-child”). Fairchild alleges that GE infringed a patent for a compressor granted to Fairchild’s assignor in 1945. Fair-child seeks damages of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Binger v. UngerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  3. Lyophile-Cryochem Corp. v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  4. Harvey v. LevineDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
  5. Orgel v. Clark Boardman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green Valley Products, Inc. v. Sterwood Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  2. NHDNC LLC v. Velcro BVBA and Velcro IP Holdings LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API