Legal Opinion
Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 2811PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
Joseph H. Hirshhorn, the plaintiff above named, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other stockholders of Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, has instituted a stockholders’ derivative action against Mine Safety Appliances Company, Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, Catalyst Research Corporation, and certain officers and directors of those corporations.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction and an accounting for profits which are based on alleged acts of fraud on the part of Mine Safety Appliances Company, Carbon Monoxide Eliminator Corporation, Catalyst Research…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Korman v. NobileDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1960
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- William A. Meier Glass Co. v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- G. & P. Amusement Co. v. Regent Theater Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.