Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1933No. 752PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cakdozo

A bill of discovery in aid of an action at law was dis^ missed by the ^District Court, 56 F., (2d) 272, but upheld upon appeal by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 62 F. (2d) 663. The question is whether the bill is good upon its face.

The respondent, Jenkins Petroléum Process Company, loaned to the petitioner, Sinclair Refining Company, then known as the Cudahy Refining Company, an experimental still for cracking petroleum oils to produce gasoline. By written agreement, any improvements developed as the result of the work of the petitioner’s engineers and experts in making themselves familiar…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API