Smith v. Bentley
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for an order directing defendants Witmark Music Library and Tams-Witmark Music Library Inc. to produce certain books, papers and documents listed in plaintiff’s notice of examination of said defendants, and also directing the defendants to answer certain questions which they have heretofore refused to answer on the examination before trial. The objections of the two named defendants may be summarized as follows:
1. The notice to produce, contained in the notice of examination, is not sufficient, since plaintiff must proceed by subpoena duces tecum under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fox v. HouseDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1939
- American Mfg. Co. v. ExermontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Binger v. UngerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. The VeloxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Garfinkle v. Arcata National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Smith v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.