Legal Opinion
W. W. Dean & Associates v. City of South San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 1987No. A033116PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1371Opinion
SCOTT, J.
In issue is whether the adoption by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco (City) of an amendment to a development plan formulated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.) (Act) constitutes an administrative act not subject to referendum. The lower court answered in the affirmative and issued a writ of mandate prohibiting a referendum election. We affirm.
I
Standard of Review on Appeal
We follow the usual standard of appellate review. Our review is limited to a determination of whether there was substantial evidence to support the judgment of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Worthington v. City Council of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Park At Cross Creek, LLC v. City of Mali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- San Bruno Comm. for Econ. Justice v. City of San Bruno, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Capo for Better Representation v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.