Legal Opinion

Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1978No. 76-1701PublishedCited by 1,903 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

The questions presented in this case are (a) whether the Endangered Species Act of 1973 requires a court to enjoin the operation of a virtually completed federal dam — which had been authorized prior to 1973 — when, pursuant to authority vested in him by Congress, the Secretary of the Interior has determined that operation of the dam would eradicate an endangered species; and (b) whether continued congressional appropriations for the dam after 1973 constituted an implied repeal of the Endangered Species Act, at least as to the particular dam.

I

The Little Tennessee River originates in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,903 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

1,898 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API