Legal Opinion

Capo for Better Representation v. Kelley

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 2008No. G037690PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case presents an instructive contrast to another election petition case that we publish today, Preserve Shorecliff Homeowners v. City of San Clemente (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1427. In Preserve Shoreclijf, there is substantial evidence of reliance by petition circulators on the acceptance by local elections officials of the practice of having petition signers also sign a circulator’s affidavit when the circulators do not live in the city involved in the petition. And that evidence was accepted by the trial court. Moreover, in Preserve Shoreclijf the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jones v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. W. W. Dean & Associates v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agosto v. Board of Trustees of Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Ni v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Anoke v. TwitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. San Diego Public Library Foundation v. FuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API