Capo for Better Representation v. Kelley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents an instructive contrast to another election petition case that we publish today, Preserve Shorecliff Homeowners v. City of San Clemente (2008) 158 Cal.App.4th 1427. In Preserve Shoreclijf, there is substantial evidence of reliance by petition circulators on the acceptance by local elections officials of the practice of having petition signers also sign a circulator’s affidavit when the circulators do not live in the city involved in the petition. And that evidence was accepted by the trial court. Moreover, in Preserve Shoreclijf the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Costa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Jones v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- W. W. Dean & Associates v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agosto v. Board of Trustees of Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ni v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Fleming v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Anoke v. TwitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- San Diego Public Library Foundation v. FuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025