Legal Opinion
Wilde v. City of Dunsmuir
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 15, 2018No. C082664PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoch, J.
*163In 1996, California voters adopted Proposition 218 (as approved by voters Gen. Elec. Nov. 5, 1996, eff. Nov. 6, 1996 < https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/sov/1996-general/official-declaration.pdf> [as of Nov. 14, 2018], archived at < https://perma.cc/PZ9U-ABQ6>) (Proposition 218) to add article XIII C to the California Constitution by which they expressly reserved their right to challenge local taxes, assessments, fees, and charges by initiative. (See generally Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil (2006) 39 Cal.4th 205, 208-209, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 73, 138 P.3d 220 ( Bighorn-Desert ).) This…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Amador Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.