Legal Opinion
Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 15, 2011No. C 08-00722 EDLPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 16, 2011, this Court granted Defendants Golden Gate National Recreation Area (“GGNRA”) and the National Park Service (“NPS”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification based on a recent Ninth Circuit decision, Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Company, 654 F.3d 903 (9th Cir.2011). Subsequently, Defendants notified the Court of another, more…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lane v. KitzhaberDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Baum v. J-B Weld Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Golden Bear Mgt. Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- In re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.