Legal Opinion

Lane v. Kitzhaber

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 6, 2012No. 3:12-cv-00138-STPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to FRCP 23(a) and (b)(2), eight individuals and an institution, United Cerebral Palsy of Oregon and Southwest Washington (“UCP”), have filed a Motion for Class Certification (docket # 11) to certify a class defined as “all individuals in Oregon with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are in, or who have been referred to, sheltered workshops” and “who are qualified for supported employment services.” First Amended Complaint, ¶¶ 32-33.

Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief based on alleged violations of Title…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnathan Lacy v. Cook County, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Kenneth R. v. HassanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
  4. Thorpe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API