Legal Opinion
In re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 30, 2024No. 4:21-cv-03825Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT 7 ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO 8 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 Re: Dkt. No. 261 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.’s (“Intuitive”) motion for 14 reconsideration.1 Intuitive moves for reconsideration of part of the Court’s March 31, 2024 Order 15 re: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF 232 (“March 31 Order”). The Court finds the 16 motion for reconsideration suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.