Legal Opinion
Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 9, 2022No. 2:16-cv-00148Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00148-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 X-Body Equipment, Inc. and Jewell 15 Attachments, LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 This is a patent case. The patent holder, Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC (ASR), moves to 20 | dismiss several counterclaims by the alleged infringers, X-Body Equipment, Inc. and Jewell 21 | Attachments LLC. Those counterclaims sound in fraud and must therefore meet the heightened 22 | pleading standard of Rule 9(b). They do not. X-Body and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.