Legal Opinion

Julian R. Woodrum, Dennis Dorsey and Sherman Johnson v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 3, 1984No. Appeal 84-651PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade 1 which affirmed the Secretary of Labor’s determination that former employees of an independent new car dealership were not eligible for benefits under the worker adjustment assistance program of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1976). It was held that the firm which employed these workers (appellants here) did not “produce” articles, which is one requirement for eligibility under Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2272(3). Further, it was held that Congress…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  2. Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API