Claude Franklin Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North Carolina, Claude F. Moffitt v. Major Fred R. Ross and State of North Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
We are met with the questions reserved by the Court in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L. Ed.2d 811.
In Douglas, the Supreme Court held that an indigent, convicted of a felony, was entitled to the assistance of assigned counsel in presenting his appeal to the state’s intermediate appellate court. It reserved the question of entitlement to assigned counsel in subsequent permissive review proceedings and limited its holding to counsel in “the one and only appeal an indigent has as of right” [emphasis -in original]. These cases present the questions…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arthur Mitchell v. Perry Johnson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Carey v. GarrisonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
- Coyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Frank D. Frazer v. State of South Carolina Henry Dargan McMaster Attorney General for South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.