Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1984No. 8310SC825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant presents 15 questions for review broadly concerning the issues of (1) whether the indictment should have been quashed and the charges dismissed on the grounds that the prose cution against him was based on unconstitutional selective prosecution; (2) whether the superseding indictment should have been quashed and the charges dismissed on the ground of unconstitutional vindictive prosecution; (3) the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand defendant’s motion to dismiss; and (4) whether the court abused its discretion in imposing a probationary judgment temporarily…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Reed v. Buckeye Fire EquipmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. BarmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API