State v. Berry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends first that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on self-defense. We find no merit in this contention.
We recognize the principle that the trial court must instruct the jury on self-defense when that question is raised by the evidence, even in the absence of a request to do so. State v. Dooley, 285 N.C. 158, 203 S.E. 2d 815 (1974). However, we do not think the evidence in this case raised the question of self-defense.
In his opening statement to the jury, before any evidence was introduced, defendant’s counsel stated that defendant contended that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986