Legal Opinion

State v. Berry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 7725SC681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends first that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on self-defense. We find no merit in this contention.

We recognize the principle that the trial court must instruct the jury on self-defense when that question is raised by the evidence, even in the absence of a request to do so. State v. Dooley, 285 N.C. 158, 203 S.E. 2d 815 (1974). However, we do not think the evidence in this case raised the question of self-defense.

In his opening statement to the jury, before any evidence was introduced, defendant’s counsel stated that defendant contended that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. RawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API