Legal Opinion

State v. . Hastings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

INDICTMENT for forgery tried at Fall Term, 1881, of Mecklenburg Superior Court, before Avery, J. Verdict of guilty, judgment, appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The defendant is charged, and npon trial was convicted of forging a bond for the payment of money to himself, and purporting to be executed by Talor Nance and A. J. Derr, as described in the indictment. Before the jury were empanelled the defendant’s counsel moved to quash the bill, basing the motion upon the facts contained in an affidavit and which the court finds to be true, that a bill for the same offence had been found at a former term, and having become mutilated, a second bill had been prepared and conveyed to the door of the grand jury room and handed to the foreman by an attorney…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. State v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API