Legal Opinion

State v. Thrift

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1985No. 8529SC256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in failing to dismiss the charge of trafficking by delivering cocaine because the State failed to offer evidence that defendant “delivered” cocaine. We disagree.

The State’s evidence showed that on 25 April 1984, S.B.I. Agent David Ramsey told defendant that he wanted to arrange a transaction for a quantity of cocaine for potential buyers in the near future. Defendant subsequently indicated to Ramsey that he had cocaine available for sale, and Ramsey drove to defendant’s house on 2 May 1984 to complete the sale.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. PeviaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. GlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. BeamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API