Legal Opinion

State v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 2004No. COA02-1690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Anthony Fernando Matthews (“defendant”) appeals his conviction for robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons stated herein, we find no error in the trial court’s judgment.

The pertinent procedural history of this case is as follows: During jury selection at trial, the State peremptorily challenged prospective jurors Sandra Haney (“Haney”) and Raecheal Weaver (“Weaver”). The defense counsel objected to their removal, noting that defendant, Haney and Weaver were all African-Americans and contended that the challenges were racially motivated. Defense counsel argued…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API