State v. Pevia

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant brings forward three assignments of error. None of them discloses prejudicial error.

Defendant first argues that the judge erred in failing to dismiss the charge of sale or delivery of marijuana.

G.S. 90-95(a)(l) states that it is unlawful for any person “[t]o manufacture, sell or deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture, sell or deliver, a controlled substance.” G.S. 90-95(b) provides:

“(b) Except as provided in subsection (h) and (i) of this section, any person who violates G.S. 90-95(a)(l) with respect to:(2) A controlled substance classified in Schedule ... VI…