Legal Opinion

State v. Beam

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 2010No. COA09-422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Under the language of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-87(7), an attempted delivery of a controlled substance satisfies the statutory definition of delivery. While the State bore the burden of proof to establish the elements of drug offenses under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95, defendant was required to prove an exemption from prosecution under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.1(a). Defendant’s evidence did not establish as a matter of law that she was legally authorized to possess the Lortab tablets. When the evidence presented did not compel a holding that defendant was induced into taking an action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChevallierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API