State v. Beam
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Under the language of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-87(7), an attempted delivery of a controlled substance satisfies the statutory definition of delivery. While the State bore the burden of proof to establish the elements of drug offenses under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95, defendant was required to prove an exemption from prosecution under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-113.1(a). Defendant’s evidence did not establish as a matter of law that she was legally authorized to possess the Lortab tablets. When the evidence presented did not compel a holding that defendant was induced into taking an action…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChevallierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014