Legal Opinion

State v. Creason

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1985No. 386PA84PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Upon review, in our discretion, of the decision of the Court of Appeals, we affirm in part and reverse in part, for the reasons hereinafter set forth.

The evidence presented by the state on voir dire tended to show the following: On 28 October 1982 John Lollis, a police officer with the city of Lexington, called Detective Mark Shue of the Rowan County Sheriffs Department and told him that he had received information that the defendant, Raymond Charles Creason, had sold LSD and marijuana at Creason’s residence within the preceding week. Lollis reported that the informant, who…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. AgeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API