Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Parmenter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1930No. 28,195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by lessee against lessor to recover damages for wrongful eviction. Defendant had a directed verdict, and plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

September 19, 1928, plaintiff was a tenant and in possession, under a written lease expiring March 1, 1929, of a farm owned by defendant. An oral agreement was then made by them for a lease of the same premises upon the same terms for another year, expiring March 1, 1980. The oral lease was not subject to sale. After it was made but before its term was to begin, defendant sold the farm to one Berry, undertaking to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. White v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. McKinney v. HarvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Cram v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Theopold v. CurtsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Holste v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Pfuhl v. SabrowskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Hagen v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Vethourlkas v. SchloffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API