Legal Opinion
Vethourlkas v. Schloff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 1934No. 29,888Published
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial.
The action was to recover damages for refusing to give possession of a store leased from defendant for a barber shop. The complaint alleges:
“That on and prior to the 15th day of August, 1931, defendant was the owner of certain store property in the city of Saint Paul, Minnesota. That shortly before said 15th day of August, 1931, defendant rented said property to plaintiff as and for a barber shop. The term of said leasing was to commence on the 15th day of August, 1931, and was to be held from' month to month in consideration…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanson v. MarionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Bean v. LampreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Hewitt v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Bruder v. WolpertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929