Legal Opinion

Vethourlkas v. Schloff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1934No. 29,888Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial.

The action was to recover damages for refusing to give possession of a store leased from defendant for a barber shop. The complaint alleges:

“That on and prior to the 15th day of August, 1931, defendant was the owner of certain store property in the city of Saint Paul, Minnesota. That shortly before said 15th day of August, 1931, defendant rented said property to plaintiff as and for a barber shop. The term of said leasing was to commence on the 15th day of August, 1931, and was to be held from' month to month in consideration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. MarionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Bean v. LampreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Hewitt v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Bruder v. WolpertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API