Legal Opinion

Theopold v. Curtsinger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1927No. 25,733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This action was brought to recover a month’s rent of a rooming house. The defendant counterclaimed for damages for plaintiff’s failure to make certain repairs. At the close of the evidence the court dismissed the counterclaim and directed the jury to return a verdict for-plaintiff for the amount of his claim. This appeal was taken from the denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff pleaded an oral lease of the house for the period of one month and from month to month thereafter at a rental of $32.50 a month, payable in advance on the first day of each month during the term…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parmenter v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Gate City Terminal Co. v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Cram v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Kirkwood v. Perry Town Lot & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Brothers v. Christian CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Williams v. MaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. McGrath v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Hewitt v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Borchardt v. KulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API