Cram v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Cant, J., denying a motion for judgment notwith- . standing the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This is an action to recover damages for defendant’s refusal tO| execute a written lease of two stores in the city of Duluth. The case was tried to the court and a jury. At the termination of the evidence a verdict was directed for defendant. This appeal is from an order denying a motion for judgment or for a new trial in the alternative.
The material facts which under our view are determinative of this appeal may be briefly stated. Plaintiff was the owner of two stores in the city of Duluth. Defendant desired a written lease therefor for one year, the time to commence at a future date.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spinney v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Townsend v. FentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Jellett v. RhodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by14 opinions
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Rognrud v. ZubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Elsberry v. SextonSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Union Car Advertising Co. v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- Labelle v. Hennepin County Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.