Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Plaintiff sues as receiver of the Alamoe Realty Company, a Minnesota corporation, now in liquidation. In overruling the general demurrer to the complaint the trial court certified the determinative question as important and doubtful under 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9498. In consequence, defendant had the right to appeal from the order and has done so.
The facts need not be much gone into. Plaintiff (as receiver of the Alamoe Realty Company) sues not for specific performance but for damages for the breach of an oral contract which defendant is alleged to have made with Alamoe…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sprague v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ormsby v. OttmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Freeman v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Bouten v. Richard Miller Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bank Midwest, Minnesota, Iowa, N.A. v. LipetzkySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Holste v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.