Harrison v. United States
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COX, Judge:
In this case, petitioner presents a Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of Mandamus, praying “for an order directing the trial judge to dismiss all the charges and specifications” or, alternatively, to prohibit him from considering matters not of record at the initial hearing. Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to issue such a writ.
*56I
Petitioner stands charged with attempted sodomy and rape, in violation of Articles 80 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880 and 920, respectively. A general court-martial was convened, and petitioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TibbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. TerlepCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. RheaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- Porter v. EggersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.