Legal Opinion

Porter v. Eggers

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 28, 1990No. ACMR MISC 9002645PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

FOREMAN, Senior Judge:

Petitioner applied to this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent, Colonel Howard C. Eggers, Military Judge in the court-martial of United States v. Tyrone R. Porter, Sergeant, United States *584Army, to dismiss the charge and the specification against petitioner on the grounds of: (1) lack of jurisdiction, and (2) violation of the speedy trial provisions of Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. EvansU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. Harrison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. LabellaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dew v. United StatesArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. MurphyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. MelansonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. OdomNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API