Legal Opinion

Harris v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1996No. 92P1107; CA A81832PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*128LEESON, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict for defendants on her claim that defendants were negligent per se,1 because they violated a Dallas city ordinance. The trial court ruled that, as a matter of law, the ordinance does not impose a duty on abutting landowners to remove leaves from sidewalks. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff seriously injured her ankle when she slipped and fell on a public sidewalk in Dallas. Defendants Sanders own the Blue Garden Restaurant that abuts the sidewalk. Defendants Dreiszus own the commercial property next door that also abuts the sidewalk. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gattman v. FavroOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gillingham v. StephensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API