Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1961PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Lane County sues to enjoin the defendants from removing the topsoil of a tract of land owned by the Winns. The particular traet'lies within the 'boundaries of the area described in Lane County Zoning and Land Use Ordinance No. 70, as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of the plaintiff county on May 27,1955. The defendant Heintz Construction Co. was, with the consent of the Winns, removing such material from their premises for use on a construction project in Lane county.

The Winns and the construction company separately demurred to plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that it failed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Vallat v. Radium Dial Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Moore v. SchermerhornOregon Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Concerned Citizens of South Kenai Peninsula v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API