Legal Opinion

Sims v. Besaw's Café

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2000No. 9611-08970; CA A99868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*183ARMSTRONG, J.

The City of Portland adopted an ordinance that prohibits Portland employers from discriminating against employees and prospective employees on a number of bases, including on the basis of sexual orientation. The ordinance implements the prohibition by providing people who are harmed by that conduct with a cause of action to redress the harm. The trial court held that Portland lacked authority to give people a cause of action that they could litigate in state court. We disagree with that conclusion and reverse, in part, the court’s judgment.

Plaintiff filed an action for employment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Heller v. Columbia Edgewater Country ClubDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  5. Youssef v. Anvil InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API