Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Plaintiff brought this action, seeking a declaratory judgment declaring that certain permit fee schedules enacted by defendant City of Eugene (the city) were invalid and seeking to recover part of the money that it had paid for permits under those fee schedules. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The city asserted that the fee schedules were validly enacted; that, even if they were not, plaintiff had paid the fees voluntarily and thus was not entitled to recover them; and that, in any event, plaintiff had failed to comply with notice requirements under the Oregon Tort…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Corrado v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.