Legal Opinion

Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1985No. TC A8110-06373 CA A28635 SC S30764PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Plaintiff was injured when defendant’s truck backed up and struck her, and she sued for damages. A jury found that defendant was not negligent. On appeal, plaintiff claimed that the trial court made erroneous rulings concerning the truck’s lack of an alarm device to signal when the truck was to be backed. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. We allowed review to consider the proper treatment of a safety regulation relating to such signals.

The regulation is OAR 437-56-095(2), a rule promulgated by the Workers’ Compensation Department under the Oregon Safe Employment Act, ORS 654.001…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Scovill v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Deckard v. BunchOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Chartrand v. Coos Bay Tavern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API