Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 2002No. 9808-06383; A110037PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff fell and fractured her ankle after stepping on a broken curb at a downtown Portland intersection. She sued the City of Portland (the city) and the owner of the adjacent property, Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc. (T & S). Both defendants moved for summary judgment. The city maintained that it was immune from liability under the Oregon Tort Claims Act. T & S argued that the ordinance on which plaintiff based what she called a “statutory tort” claim does not apply under the facts of this case, and, if it does, it violates the Portland City Charter and is therefore void. The trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Murrell v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
  3. Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Sande v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API