State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of child endangerment under ORS 163.575(l)(b), which prohibits knowingly permitting a minor “to enter or remain in a place where unlawful activity involving controlled substances is maintained or conducted.” The issue in this case is whether that statute is violated when a person knowingly possesses drugs in a container — here, a purse — while in a car with two children. As we will explain, contrary to defendant’s argument, we conclude that a person in that circumstance can be found to have engaged in unlawful “activity” involving controlled substances.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HedgpethOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Giron-CortezOregon Supreme Court · 2024
- Kinzua Resources v. DEQOregon Supreme Court · 2020
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.