Sherman v. Sandell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Plaintiffs are the daughters of the defendant, Catherine Sandell, formerly Catherine Bornheimer, and seek by this action a judgment declaring that certain lands were conveyed to and are held by her in trust for them; that she be restrained from mak*374ing any conveyance or other disposition of said lands, and that the court remove her from her office as trustee of said lands, and appoint another trustee in her place. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, from which and from an order denying a new trial the plaintiffs have appealed.
In December, 1871, Francis Bornheimer was the husband…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by48 opinions
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.