Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
This appeal requires us to determine what an insured must prove in order to establish its rights under a lost or destroyed insurance policy. The trial court found that the insured had introduced sufficient secondary evidence to prove the substance of the policy’s material provisions, and rendered judgment for the insured. The Court of Appeal held that the insured was required instead to prove the actual words of those provisions, and reversed the judgment. As will appear, we conclude that the holding was erroneous, and therefore reverse the Court of Appeal’s judgment, with…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- People v. HovarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kaufman v. ACS Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Century Surety Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.