Legal Opinion

Maher v. Saad

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 2000No. C032353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.

Defendant Sylvia B. Saad, M.D., appeals from the trial court’s granting of plaintiffs’ motion for new trial following a jury verdict in favor of defendant in an action alleging medical malpractice. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

Procedural Background

By complaint filed April 16, 1997, plaintiffs Martie L. Maher and Sheldon Raymond Russell sought to recover damages from defendant and other parties for medical malpractice and loss of consortium arising from medical treatment rendered to Maher. All other defendants were dismissed or awarded summary judgment.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Paramount Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pitt v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Hand Electronics, Inc. v. Snowline Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Pepper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Haley v. Casa Del Rey Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Whitlock v. FOSTER WHEELER, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Mason v. Lake Dolores Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Porter v. WynerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API