Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1977No. Civ. 52060PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Bernard Reich, attorney of record for Albert Pepper, the representative plaintiff in a class action against real party in interest, was removed as counsel by reason of a trial court determination of a conflict of interest. A petition to this court for an alternative writ reviewing that order was denied for unclean hands. Albert Pepper died leaving a will designating Reich as a co-executor. Relying upon its former order, the trial court refused to permit Reich to prosecute the class action in that capacity.

This petition, which we treat as one for a writ of mandate, raises…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. City of Downey v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chronometrics, Inc. v. Sysgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. 14859 Moorpark Homeowner's Assn. v. Vrt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Moorpark Homeowners Assn. v. Vrt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. California Satellite Systems, Inc. v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Elliott v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API