Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Paramount Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1995No. B082976PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

This case presents the sometimes knotty question of the proper application of the “shifting burdens of proof” applicable to employment discrimination cases as first set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 [36 L.Ed.2d 668, 93 S.Ct. 1817] (hereafter, McDonnell Douglas). Due to the confusion which is attendant to application of this legal concept in various trial and pretrial proceedings, we discuss its purpose and use at length below.

Plaintiff Richard Caldwell (Caldwell) sued Paramount Unified School District (the District) 1 for breach of contract,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Jensen v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Hersant v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API