Legal Opinion

Pitt v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1932No. Docket No. 535PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBEET, J., pro tem.

The facts leading up to this controversy are briefly: On July 19, 1926, the respondent was operating a freight train in interstate commerce in Eiverside County, California, and transporting freight in a westerly direction toward Los Angeles, California. Leslie M. Shaw, now deceased, was an employee of respondent on said date and was acting as a “swing brakeman”. He had received instructions that when the train reached a station called Garnet, a helper “cut” was to be made, that is, an extra engine was to be added to the train for the purpose of assisting the train up…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Varas v. Barco Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API