Pitt v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBEET, J., pro tem.
The facts leading up to this controversy are briefly: On July 19, 1926, the respondent was operating a freight train in interstate commerce in Eiverside County, California, and transporting freight in a westerly direction toward Los Angeles, California. Leslie M. Shaw, now deceased, was an employee of respondent on said date and was acting as a “swing brakeman”. He had received instructions that when the train reached a station called Garnet, a helper “cut” was to be made, that is, an extra engine was to be added to the train for the purpose of assisting the train up…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Varas v. Barco Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.