Legal Opinion

Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1952No. Sac. 6232PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for new trial in an action for wrongful death. The motion was granted for asserted error in instructions. We have concluded that the jury were correctly instructed. It necessarily follows that the trial court’s order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial cannot be sustained.

Bill Conner, plaintiffs’ son, was killed when defendants’ train struck an automobile which was being steered by Conner while in tow of a pickup truck driven by Richard Benson. Benson drove upgrade at a speed of about five miles an hour across…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dodds v. GiffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hale v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. McCoy v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Bell v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API