Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. FOSTER WHEELER, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 2008No. A117221PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HORNER, J. *

Plaintiffs and respondents Paul and Marguerite Whitlock (jointly the Whitlocks) sued defendant and appellant Foster Wheeler, LLC (Foster Wheeler), among others, asserting negligence, strict liability and loss of consortium for mesothelioma and other lung damage contracted by Paul Whitlock after his exposure to asbestos allegedly manufactured and distributed by Foster Wheeler. After a trial lasting 16 days, the jury deliberated for three days before returning a defense verdict in favor of Foster Wheeler. The Whitlocks moved for a new trial based on juror misconduct, which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. NeslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Barboni v. TuomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Toste v. CalPortland ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Brown v. City of Sacramento, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API