Legal Opinion

Flater v. Grace

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 2009No. SC 18253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The defendant, Kevin M. Grace, individually and doing business as Grace Builders, 1 appeals from the trial court’s decision denying his motion to open the judgment awarding the plaintiffs, Michael Flater and Tracy Flater, $92,831 in damages for the defendant’s failure to complete and perform satisfactorily a home improvement contract. The essence of the defendant’s claim is that it was an abuse of discretion and inequitable for the court not to open the judgment because the defendant, in deciding not to defend against the claims, had relied on an estimate that the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Priest v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. State v. HansonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Har v. BoreikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Warner v. BROCHENDORFFConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Ellis v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API